w***@gmail.com
2017-04-11 05:17:07 UTC
A book I have called OAHSPE published in 1882 says this "There are two
known things in the universe: ethe and corpor. The former is the solvent
of the latter. For comparison, take a lump of table-salt, which, though
white, is impervious to the sight of man. Cast it into water, and it is
lost to sight; though it still existeth, the sight of man can see through
it. Earth substance, as such is equally soluble in ethe. And the great
etherean firmament is thus constituted; being a dense solution of corpor.
In the main, etherea is transparent; but in some places translucent, and
opaque. Here are iron, and copper, and granite, and water, and lead, and
clay, and nitrogen, and oxygen, and hydrogen, and various other kinds of
corporeal substances, as known on earth, and besides these, millions of
things not known on the earth. And ethe holdeth them in solution; even
after the manner that air holdeth the substance of clouds, which is water
in solution. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner
of a whirlwind on earth), the corporeal solutions are propelled toward the
centre thereof in greater density. When it is sufficiently dense to
manifest light and shadow, it is called a comet, or nebula; when it is
still more dense it is a planet. As previously stated, ethe holdeth corpor
in solution, which is the condition of atmospherea and of the etherean
regions beyond. When a portion of this solution is given a rotary motion
it is called a vortex. The earth floateth in the midst of a vortex, the
outer extremity of which is somewhat beyond the moon. The vortex is
globular, corresponding to the form of the earth, with slight differences,
which will be pointed out hereafter. The vortex turneth the earth on its
axis, with its own axial motion. Consequently the outer part of the vortex
hath greater velocity than near the earth's surface, which hath an axial
motion of one thousand miles an hour. The outer rim, forty-two thousand
miles broad of the earth's vortex, hath a revolution axially with the
earth once a month. [The earth's vortex was discovered by space scientist
beginning in 1958 and named the magnetosphere, the magnetosphere was not
even theorized untill 1931, but OAHSPE described it in 1881]. The swiftest
part of the earth's vortex is therefore about fifteen thousand miles this
side of the orbit of the moon. From the swiftest part of the earth's
vortex, its force is toward the earth's centre. And if there was no earth
here at present, the vortex would make one presently. Things fall not to
the earth because of gravity therein, but are driven toward the centre of
the vortex, by the power of the vortex. The greater diameter of the vortex
is east and west; the lesser diameter north and south, with an inclination
and oscillation relatively like the earth."
let me know what you think of the physics of OAHSPE part 1, I will send
you part two later so the message is not too long. Also feel free to not
discussing physics and metaphysics with you.
talk to you later
Michael
Well, It would be a great story, except most of Oahspe's "physics" was disproved by Sir Issac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, and Albert Einstein.known things in the universe: ethe and corpor. The former is the solvent
of the latter. For comparison, take a lump of table-salt, which, though
white, is impervious to the sight of man. Cast it into water, and it is
lost to sight; though it still existeth, the sight of man can see through
it. Earth substance, as such is equally soluble in ethe. And the great
etherean firmament is thus constituted; being a dense solution of corpor.
In the main, etherea is transparent; but in some places translucent, and
opaque. Here are iron, and copper, and granite, and water, and lead, and
clay, and nitrogen, and oxygen, and hydrogen, and various other kinds of
corporeal substances, as known on earth, and besides these, millions of
things not known on the earth. And ethe holdeth them in solution; even
after the manner that air holdeth the substance of clouds, which is water
in solution. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner
of a whirlwind on earth), the corporeal solutions are propelled toward the
centre thereof in greater density. When it is sufficiently dense to
manifest light and shadow, it is called a comet, or nebula; when it is
still more dense it is a planet. As previously stated, ethe holdeth corpor
in solution, which is the condition of atmospherea and of the etherean
regions beyond. When a portion of this solution is given a rotary motion
it is called a vortex. The earth floateth in the midst of a vortex, the
outer extremity of which is somewhat beyond the moon. The vortex is
globular, corresponding to the form of the earth, with slight differences,
which will be pointed out hereafter. The vortex turneth the earth on its
axis, with its own axial motion. Consequently the outer part of the vortex
hath greater velocity than near the earth's surface, which hath an axial
motion of one thousand miles an hour. The outer rim, forty-two thousand
miles broad of the earth's vortex, hath a revolution axially with the
earth once a month. [The earth's vortex was discovered by space scientist
beginning in 1958 and named the magnetosphere, the magnetosphere was not
even theorized untill 1931, but OAHSPE described it in 1881]. The swiftest
part of the earth's vortex is therefore about fifteen thousand miles this
side of the orbit of the moon. From the swiftest part of the earth's
vortex, its force is toward the earth's centre. And if there was no earth
here at present, the vortex would make one presently. Things fall not to
the earth because of gravity therein, but are driven toward the centre of
the vortex, by the power of the vortex. The greater diameter of the vortex
is east and west; the lesser diameter north and south, with an inclination
and oscillation relatively like the earth."
let me know what you think of the physics of OAHSPE part 1, I will send
you part two later so the message is not too long. Also feel free to not
discussing physics and metaphysics with you.
talk to you later
Michael
Are you ANTI-SCIENCE? or just have not read anything about science except Oahspe, and just figured because it was in Oahspe, it must be true?
You see, some Oahspe Bible students decided to test out Cosmogony in 1995, and found that most if not all of Cosmogony was disproven, some 200 years even before Oahspe was written.
Oahspe is a great read if you like religious fiction, but as for science, forget about it.
The entirety of Vortex Currents and planetary motion by a mechanical universe proposed in Oahspe, was already 17th Century scientific thought proposed first by Rene Descartes(1596-1650),
"Because of his philosophical beliefs, René Descartes proposed in 1644 that no empty space can exist and that space must consequently be filled with matter. The parts of this matter tend to move in straight paths, but because they lie close together, they can not move freely, which according to Descartes implies that every motion is circular, so the aether is filled with vortices. Descartes also distinguishes between different forms and sizes of matter in which rough matter resists the circular movement more strongly than fine matter. Due to centrifugal force, matter tends towards the outer edges of the vortex, which causes a condensation of this matter there. The rough matter cannot follow this movement due to its greater inertia—so due to the pressure of the condensed outer matter those parts will be pushed into the center of the vortex. According to Descartes, this inward pressure is nothing else than gravity. He compared this mechanism with the fact that if a rotating, liquid filled vessel is stopped, the liquid goes on to rotate. Now, if one drops small pieces of light matter (e.g. wood) into the vessel, the pieces move to the middle of the vessel.[4] [5] [6]
Following the basic premises of Descartes, Christiaan Huygens between 1669 and 1690 designed a much more exact vortex model. This model was the first theory of gravitation which was worked out mathematically. He assumed that the aether particles are moving in every direction, but were thrown back at the outer borders of the vortex and this causes (as in the case of Descartes) a greater concentration of fine matter at the outer borders. So also in his model the fine matter presses the rough matter into the center of the vortex. Huygens also found out that the centrifugal force is equal to the force, which acts in the direction of the center of the vortex (centripetal force). He also posited that bodies must consist mostly of empty space so that the aether can penetrate the bodies easily, which is necessary for mass proportionality. He further concluded that the aether moves much faster than the falling bodies. At this time, Newton developed his theory of gravitation which is based on attraction, and although Huygens agreed with the mathematical formalism, he said the model was insufficient due to the lack of a mechanical explanation of the force law. Newton's discovery that gravity obeys the inverse square law surprised Huygens and he tried to take this into account by assuming that the speed of the aether is smaller in greater distance.[6][7][8]
Criticism: Newton objected to the theory because drag must lead to noticeable deviations of the orbits which were not observed.[9] Another problem was that moons often move in different directions, against the direction of the vortex motion. Also, Huygens' explanation of the inverse square law is circular, because this means that the aether obeys Kepler's third law. But a theory of gravitation has to explain those laws and must not presuppose them." Wikipedia
There is an excellent paper, showing the two ideas of Descartes Vortex Theory, and Newton's "Principe."
We would all love for Oahspe to be correct in the realm of science, but sadly Oahspe's Cosmogony was already relegated to the DUSTBIN of scientific thought almost 200 years before Oahspe was written.
Cosmogony, is therefore clearly plagiarized rubbish, and therefore PSEUDO SCIENCE. If Newbrough just copied Cosmogony from other books, and it looks like he did, then by all standards of reason and logic, we must also relegate Oahspe to the DUST BIN of history.
By reason, if Oahspe's Cosmogony is Rubbish, Oahpse is Rubbish. Sorry Michael, you cannot have it any other way.
You might want to check out this excellent paper on wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Scholium#Rejecting_Cartesian_vortices